J (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) [2023] EWCA Civ 465 (28 April 2023)
The judge correctly applied the established legal test for reopening findings of fact in children's cases, weighing all relevant factors and exercising discretion to permit reopening in order to achieve a reliable factual matrix for welfare decisions. The restrictive approach in RL v Nottinghamshire CC is not applicable; the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 465
- Parties
- Appellant: F2; 1st Respondent: Local Authority; Child Party: A; Intervener: Children's Guardian; Mother: M; Father: F1
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Reopening Findings of Fact, Care Proceedings, Child Protection, Finality in Litigation, Threshold Criteria
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F2
Appellant
Local Authority
1st Respondent
A
Child Party
Children's Guardian
Intervener
M
Mother
F1
Father
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Family Court should permit reopening of previous non-findings regarding sexual assault allegations against F2
- 2 Whether new evidence or information justifies revisiting prior findings
- 3 Appropriate legal test for reopening findings in children's cases
Ratio Decidendi
The judge correctly applied the established legal test for reopening findings of fact in children's cases, weighing all relevant factors and exercising discretion to permit reopening in order to achieve a reliable factual matrix for welfare decisions. The restrictive approach in RL v Nottinghamshire CC is not applicable; the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to reopen previous non-findings regarding A's allegations is upheld
- Substantial threshold hearing to proceed as ordered by the Family Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment