Abdi v Manchester City Council & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 1214 (20 October 2023)

Abdi v Manchester City Council & Ors [2023] EWCA Civ 1214 (20 October 2023)

The appellant was properly found in contempt for failing to comply with fresh court orders to return the children and provide information, as the evidence established he was able to comply but deliberately refused. Successive committal orders were lawful, and the 12-month sentence was justified and proportionate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Civ 1214
Parties
Appellant: Fahad Abdi; First Respondent: Manchester City Council; Second to Fifth Respondents: The Children via their Children's Guardian; Sixth Respondent: Maryan Yusef
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 October 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil, Family Division) / Appeal Against Committal Order for Contempt of Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Committal for Contempt, Enforcement of Child Return Orders, Procedural Fairness, Successive Contempt Orders
Family Law Contempt of Court Committal for Contempt Enforcement of Child Return Orders Procedural Fairness Successive Contempt Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fahad Abdi

Appellant

Manchester City Council

First Respondent

The Children via their Children's Guardian

Second to Fifth Respondents

Maryan Yusef

Sixth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil, Family Division) / Appeal Against Committal Order for Contempt of Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was properly found in contempt for failing to comply with court orders to return children and provide information
  2. 2 Whether successive committal orders for similar breaches are lawful
  3. 3 Whether imprisonment was proportionate and justified

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was properly found in contempt for failing to comply with fresh court orders to return the children and provide information, as the evidence established he was able to comply but deliberately refused. Successive committal orders were lawful, and the 12-month sentence was justified and proportionate given the persistent and serious nature of the breaches. Procedural fairness was observed throughout.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Committal order for 12 months' imprisonment upheld
  • No breach of civil or human rights found