Fahad Abdi v Manchester City Council & Ors
The findings of contempt and the sentence imposed were justified and proportionate; the court had jurisdiction as the children were habitually resident in England and Wales; there was no double jeopardy or unlawful aggregate sentencing; and no infringement of Mr Abdi’s human rights was established.
- Parties
- Appellant: Fahad Abdi; First Respondent: Manchester City Council; Second to Fifth Respondents: The Children (via their Children’s Guardian); Sixth Respondent: Maryan Yusef
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family/committal) / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Committal for Contempt, Jurisdiction Over Children, Habitual Residence, Successive Committal Orders, Human Rights in Family Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fahad Abdi
Appellant
Manchester City Council
First Respondent
The Children (via their Children’s Guardian)
Second to Fifth Respondents
Maryan Yusef
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family/committal) / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the findings of contempt against Mr Abdi were properly made
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 3 Whether the court had jurisdiction over the children
Ratio Decidendi
The findings of contempt and the sentence imposed were justified and proportionate; the court had jurisdiction as the children were habitually resident in England and Wales; there was no double jeopardy or unlawful aggregate sentencing; and no infringement of Mr Abdi’s human rights was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; committal order and sentence affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment