Fahad Abdi v Manchester City Council & Ors

Fahad Abdi v Manchester City Council & Ors

The findings of contempt and the sentence imposed were justified and proportionate; the court had jurisdiction as the children were habitually resident in England and Wales; there was no double jeopardy or unlawful aggregate sentencing; and no infringement of Mr Abdi’s human rights was established.

Parties
Appellant: Fahad Abdi; First Respondent: Manchester City Council; Second to Fifth Respondents: The Children (via their Children’s Guardian); Sixth Respondent: Maryan Yusef
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family/committal) / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Committal for Contempt, Jurisdiction Over Children, Habitual Residence, Successive Committal Orders, Human Rights in Family Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fahad Abdi

Appellant

Manchester City Council

First Respondent

The Children (via their Children’s Guardian)

Second to Fifth Respondents

Maryan Yusef

Sixth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (family/committal) / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the findings of contempt against Mr Abdi were properly made
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  3. 3 Whether the court had jurisdiction over the children

Ratio Decidendi

The findings of contempt and the sentence imposed were justified and proportionate; the court had jurisdiction as the children were habitually resident in England and Wales; there was no double jeopardy or unlawful aggregate sentencing; and no infringement of Mr Abdi’s human rights was established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; committal order and sentence affirmed