Ali v R [2008] EWCA Crim 1522 (17 July 2008)

Ali v R [2008] EWCA Crim 1522 (17 July 2008)

The conviction was unsafe because the identification evidence was weak, the CCTV images were not sufficiently clear for jury comparison, and the judge failed to give adequate directions on the dangers of mistaken identification when inviting the jury to use their own eyes to compare the images with the defendant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2008] EWCA Crim 1522
Parties
Appellant: Faraz Ali; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Robbery, Jury Directions, CCTV Evidence, Unsafe Conviction
Criminal Law Identification Evidence Robbery Jury Directions CCTV Evidence Unsafe Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Faraz Ali

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was safe given the quality of identification evidence and judicial directions to the jury.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was unsafe because the identification evidence was weak, the CCTV images were not sufficiently clear for jury comparison, and the judge failed to give adequate directions on the dangers of mistaken identification when inviting the jury to use their own eyes to compare the images with the defendant.

Court Disposition

conviction quashed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed
  • Conviction quashed