Wyatt, R. (On the Application of) v Fareham Borough Council
The court held that Fareham Borough Council's grant of planning permission was lawful, the appropriate assessment was sufficiently precautionary, the occupancy rate and land classification were rational and evidence-based, procedural breaches were immaterial, and the planning officer's report and application of planning policy were not irrational or perverse.
- Parties
- Claimant: Ronald Wyatt, Chairperson of Brook Avenue Residents Against Development (BARAD), acting in a representative capacity; Defendant: Fareham Borough Council; Interested Party: Lorraine Louise Hanslip; Interested Party: Michael Hanslip; Interested Party: Thomas Lewis Hanslip; Interested Party: Natural England
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habitats Directive, Precautionary Principle, Planning Permission, Nutrient Neutrality, Local Government Procedure, Judicial Review Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ronald Wyatt, Chairperson of Brook Avenue Residents Against Development (BARAD), acting in a representative capacity
Claimant
Fareham Borough Council
Defendant
Lorraine Louise Hanslip
Interested Party
Michael Hanslip
Interested Party
Thomas Lewis Hanslip
Interested Party
Natural England
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Fareham Borough Council's grant of planning permission complied with the Habitats Regulations and the precautionary principle
- 2 Whether the occupancy rate used in the nutrient budget was sufficiently precautionary
- 3 Whether land classification for nitrogen calculations was rational and evidence-based
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that Fareham Borough Council's grant of planning permission was lawful, the appropriate assessment was sufficiently precautionary, the occupancy rate and land classification were rational and evidence-based, procedural breaches were immaterial, and the planning officer's report and application of planning policy were not irrational or perverse.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment