Fareham Borough Council v Miller

Fareham Borough Council v Miller

The Council was justified in serving the notice to quit and seeking possession due to persistent criminal and anti-social behaviour associated with the flat. Mr Miller's personal circumstances did not meet the high threshold for a proportionality review under Article 8 ECHR, and the Council's actions were neither Wednesbury unreasonable nor disproportionate.

Parties
Appellant: Fareham Borough Council; Respondent: Terry Miller
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Non Secure Tenancy, Article 8 ECHR, Proportionality Review, Wednesbury Unreasonableness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fareham Borough Council

Appellant

Terry Miller

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Council's decision to seek possession was reasonable and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether the notice to quit was legally effective to terminate the tenancy
  3. 3 Whether Mr Miller's personal circumstances justified a proportionality review

Ratio Decidendi

The Council was justified in serving the notice to quit and seeking possession due to persistent criminal and anti-social behaviour associated with the flat. Mr Miller's personal circumstances did not meet the high threshold for a proportionality review under Article 8 ECHR, and the Council's actions were neither Wednesbury unreasonable nor disproportionate.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order for possession granted in favour of Fareham Borough Council