I (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 1765 (20 November 2012)
The judge was not obliged to address special guardianship in detail as it was not properly argued at trial, and his decision not to make a contact order was a proper exercise of discretion, supported by the evidence and statutory framework. There was no flaw in the judge's reasoning or process.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 1765
- Parties
- Appellant: Father; Appellant: Paternal Grandmother; First Respondent: London Borough of Croydon; Second Respondent: Mother; Third Respondent: Child (A) by her Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Division, Principal Registry
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Special Guardianship, Contact Orders, Article 8 ECHR, Placement Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Appellant
Paternal Grandmother
Appellant
London Borough of Croydon
First Respondent
Mother
Second Respondent
Child (A) by her Children's Guardian
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Family Division, Principal Registry
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred by failing to consider special guardianship as an alternative to a placement order
- 2 Whether the judge erred in failing to make or consider a contact order in favour of the appellants
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was not obliged to address special guardianship in detail as it was not properly argued at trial, and his decision not to make a contact order was a proper exercise of discretion, supported by the evidence and statutory framework. There was no flaw in the judge's reasoning or process.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no order for special guardianship or contact made; placement order stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment