Father v Mother & Anor
The lower court's reasons did not sustain the finding of sexual touching by the father. There was a misunderstanding of the evidence and no reasonable judge could have reached the conclusion that was reached. The appeal was allowed and the findings set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Father; First Respondent: Mother; Second Respondent: The Child (by her 16.4 Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding and Child Arrangements Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; findings and child arrangements order set aside; fresh fact-finding hearing ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal, Fact Finding Hearing, Child Arrangements Order, Sexual Abuse Allegations, Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Appellant
Mother
First Respondent
The Child (by her 16.4 Guardian)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding and Child Arrangements Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lower court's finding of sexual touching by the father was wrong or unjust
- 2 Whether the child arrangements order based on that finding should be set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The lower court's reasons did not sustain the finding of sexual touching by the father. There was a misunderstanding of the evidence and no reasonable judge could have reached the conclusion that was reached. The appeal was allowed and the findings set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; findings and child arrangements order set aside; fresh fact-finding hearing ordered.
Orders
- The finding of sexual touching by the father is set aside.
- The child arrangements order of 5 February 2024 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment