C (A Child), Re
The judge's directions were set aside because the proceedings remained complex, the transfer was procedurally improper, made without notice or opportunity for representations, and contrary to applicable rules. The fact-finding hearing should remain in the county court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Father; First Respondent: Mother; Second Respondent: A (the child) by guardian ad litem Mrs Gould
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children Act Proceedings / Appeal From Directions Order in County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Proceedings, Fact Finding Hearings, Procedural Fairness, Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Appellant
Mother
First Respondent
A (the child) by guardian ad litem Mrs Gould
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children Act Proceedings / Appeal From Directions Order in County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the county court judge erred in transferring the fact-finding hearing to the family proceedings court without a hearing or representations from the parties
- 2 Whether the complexity criterion for county court jurisdiction still applied
- 3 Whether procedural rules for transfer and notice were followed
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's directions were set aside because the proceedings remained complex, the transfer was procedurally improper, made without notice or opportunity for representations, and contrary to applicable rules. The fact-finding hearing should remain in the county court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Directions of Judge Case dated 6 February 2008 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment