B-Q (A Child)
The judge erred in law by attaching a Power of Arrest to the non-molestation order without evidence or finding of violence or threat of violence, contrary to statutory requirements. The discretionary conclusions on the Section 8 application were not materially affected by the CAFCASS officer's errors or by the judge's treatment of the child's wishes.
- Parties
- Subject: B-Q (A Child); Appellant: Father (Appellant); Respondent: Mother (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Family Division to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; application granted
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Order, Power of Arrest, Section 8 Order, Child Residence and Contact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B-Q (A Child)
Subject
Father (Appellant)
Appellant
Mother (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Family Division to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in law by attaching a Power of Arrest to a non-molestation order without statutory basis
- 2 Whether the judge's discretionary conclusions on the Section 8 application were contaminated by errors in the CAFCASS officer's report
- 3 Whether the judge gave adequate weight to the wishes and feelings of the child
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in law by attaching a Power of Arrest to the non-molestation order without evidence or finding of violence or threat of violence, contrary to statutory requirements. The discretionary conclusions on the Section 8 application were not materially affected by the CAFCASS officer's errors or by the judge's treatment of the child's wishes.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; application granted
Orders
- Power of Arrest provision attached to the non-molestation order set aside
- Paragraph 3 of the order at page A34 amended to delete Power of Arrest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment