B (Children : Uncertain Perpetrator) (Rev 1)
The Judge wrongly placed the burden on the father to exclude himself from the pool of perpetrators, failed to require the local authority to make out a positive case, inadequately assessed the evidence, and did not address evidential gaps or credibility. The threshold finding was flawed and must be set aside; the matter is remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: Father; Respondent Local Authority: London Borough of Islington; Respondent: Mother; Respondent: Children (through Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Appeal From Central Family Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; threshold finding set aside; matter remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Threshold Conditions, Identification of Perpetrator, Burden of Proof, Pool of Perpetrators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Appellant
London Borough of Islington
Respondent Local Authority
Mother
Respondent
Children (through Guardian)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Appeal From Central Family Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper approach to identification of perpetrator in child harm cases
- 2 Application of pool of perpetrators concept
- 3 Burden and standard of proof in care proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Judge wrongly placed the burden on the father to exclude himself from the pool of perpetrators, failed to require the local authority to make out a positive case, inadequately assessed the evidence, and did not address evidential gaps or credibility. The threshold finding was flawed and must be set aside; the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; threshold finding set aside; matter remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- Immediate case management hearing to be listed before Family Division Liaison Judge.
- All options remain open at rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment