S & L (Children), Re
The judge erred in refusing to permit psychological and parenting assessments of the father, as his decision was premature, inadequately reasoned, and failed to consider the interests of the children and the prior order for assessment. The appellate court allowed the appeal and ordered the assessments to proceed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Father; First Respondent: Local Authority; Respondent: Mother; Respondent: Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (children) / Appeal From Fact Finding and Case Management Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Parental Assessment, Case Management Discretion, Public Funding in Family Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Appellant
Local Authority
First Respondent
Mother
Respondent
Children's Guardian
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children) / Appeal From Fact Finding and Case Management Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to permit psychological and parenting assessments of the father in care proceedings
- 2 Whether the judge's exercise of discretion in case management was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in refusing to permit psychological and parenting assessments of the father, as his decision was premature, inadequately reasoned, and failed to consider the interests of the children and the prior order for assessment. The appellate court allowed the appeal and ordered the assessments to proceed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission granted for psychological and parenting assessments of the father to be carried out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment