N-A (Children), Re [2017] EWCA Civ 230 (05 April 2017)

N-A (Children), Re [2017] EWCA Civ 230 (05 April 2017)

The judge was entitled to find that the boys' wishes were influenced by the father and that they did not fully understand the implications of a permanent move to Iran. The judge's failure to report evolving impressions from the meeting with the children did not materially affect the outcome, as the decision was based on a holistic assessment of welfare, including the likely damage to the boys' relationship with their mother, educational disruption, language barriers, and uncertainty about the father's employment and health. The appeal was dismissed as no material error was demonstrated in the judge's approach.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Civ 230
Parties
Appellant: Father; Respondent: Mother
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Child Relocation, Welfare of the Child, Children's Wishes and Feelings, Contact Orders, Judicial Meetings With Children
Family Law Child Relocation Welfare of the Child Children's Wishes and Feelings Contact Orders Judicial Meetings With Children

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Father

Appellant

Mother

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge gave insufficient weight to the children's wishes and feelings regarding relocation to Iran
  2. 2 Whether the judge improperly gathered and relied on evidence from the children during a judicial meeting, contrary to the 2010 Guidelines for Judges Meeting Children who are Subject to Family Proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the judge failed to inform the parties of impressions formed during the meeting with the children, depriving them of the opportunity to address those impressions

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to find that the boys' wishes were influenced by the father and that they did not fully understand the implications of a permanent move to Iran. The judge's failure to report evolving impressions from the meeting with the children did not materially affect the outcome, as the decision was based on a holistic assessment of welfare, including the likely damage to the boys' relationship with their mother, educational disruption, language barriers, and uncertainty about the father's employment and health. The appeal was dismissed as no material error was demonstrated in the judge's approach.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Children to remain in England
  • Contact order for boys to see mother at least once a month, with parents to arrange