Re A (A Child) (Habitual Residence: 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention)

Re A (A Child) (Habitual Residence: 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention)

The judge erred by applying an incomplete legal test for habitual residence, focusing only on integration in Zambia and failing to conduct a comparative analysis of the child's connections to England and Zambia. The application was within the scope of the Family Law Act 1986, and the relevant date for habitual...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Father; Respondent: Mother
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing
Legal Topics
Habitual Residence, Jurisdiction, Child Abduction, 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention, Family Law Act 1986
Family Law Private International Law Habitual Residence Jurisdiction Child Abduction 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention Family Law Act 1986

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Father

Appellant

Mother

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge applied the correct legal test for habitual residence of the child
  2. 2 Whether the relevant date for determining habitual residence is the date of application or hearing
  3. 3 Whether the application fell within the scope of the Family Law Act 1986

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred by applying an incomplete legal test for habitual residence, focusing only on integration in Zambia and failing to conduct a comparative analysis of the child's connections to England and Zambia. The application was within the scope of the Family Law Act 1986, and the relevant date for habitual residence is the date of the application. The case must be remitted for rehearing on the issue of the child's habitual residence at the date of the application.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing

Orders

  • The issue of the child's habitual residence at the date of the father's application is to be reheard before a different judge to be nominated by the President of the Family Division.