M (Children)
The judge at first instance erred in her approach to protective measures, failing to properly consider their adequacy and enforceability in the USA. There was no legitimate basis to doubt the efficacy of US courts and police in enforcing protective measures. The appeal is allowed and the children are to be returned to the USA subject to conditions ensuring protective measures are in place.
- Parties
- Applicant: Father; Respondent: Mother
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Summary Return of Children, Protective Measures, Article 13(b) Hague Convention, Domestic Violence, Habitual Residence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Father
Applicant
Mother
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether protective measures proposed by the father are adequate to mitigate grave risk of harm under Article 13(b) of the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the judge at first instance correctly applied the legal process for summary return under the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The judge at first instance erred in her approach to protective measures, failing to properly consider their adequacy and enforceability in the USA. There was no legitimate basis to doubt the efficacy of US courts and police in enforcing protective measures. The appeal is allowed and the children are to be returned to the USA subject to conditions ensuring protective measures are in place.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Children to be returned to the USA immediately, subject to father providing evidence of a consent order entered in the Superior Court of New Jersey and landlord's consent to subletting or assignment of tenancy to mother or her exclusive occupation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment