F (A Child)

F (A Child)

The judge's orders, including the prohibition of contact, injunctions, and section 91(14) order, were justified by the father's persistent abusive behaviour, failure to accept findings, and the intolerable distress contact would cause the child. There was no error of law or conclusion outside the permissible range. Permission to appeal was refused.

Parties
Appellant: Father; Respondent: Mother
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Family / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Child Contact, Injunctions, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Change of Child's Surname
Family Law Child Contact Injunctions Section 91(14) Children Act 1989 Change of Child's Surname

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Father

Appellant

Mother

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the orders preventing contact and imposing injunctions were justified
  2. 2 Whether the section 91(14) order precluded appeal
  3. 3 Whether findings of fact could be challenged

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's orders, including the prohibition of contact, injunctions, and section 91(14) order, were justified by the father's persistent abusive behaviour, failure to accept findings, and the intolerable distress contact would cause the child. There was no error of law or conclusion outside the permissible range. Permission to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal refused