H (A Child), Re

H (A Child), Re

The judge's decision to grant permission for the mother to relocate the child to the Czech Republic was a proper exercise of discretion, balancing the welfare of the child, the mother's emotional well-being, and the practical arrangements for the child, despite the inevitable truncation of the father's relationship. The guidance in Payne v Payne remains binding and applicable.

Parties
Appellant: Father; Respondent: Mother
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 May 2010
Procedural Posture
Family / Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
International Child Relocation, Child Welfare, Parental Contact, Children Act 1989, Relocation Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Father

Appellant

Mother

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the judge properly exercised discretion in granting the mother permission to relocate the child to the Czech Republic
  2. 2 Whether the contact arrangements for the father were appropriate given the relocation
  3. 3 Whether the guidance in Payne v Payne should be reconsidered

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision to grant permission for the mother to relocate the child to the Czech Republic was a proper exercise of discretion, balancing the welfare of the child, the mother's emotional well-being, and the practical arrangements for the child, despite the inevitable truncation of the father's relationship. The guidance in Payne v Payne remains binding and applicable.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Mother permitted to relocate child to Czech Republic
  • Father's contact arrangements as previously ordered remain in force