FB v PS
The TS Trust is a resource of the Husband and should be treated as such for the purposes of asset division. Both parties made equal contributions to the marriage and the business, but the unmatched contribution of AR by TS justifies a departure from equality. The appropriate approach is to remove the majority of AR's value from the matrimonial assets before equal division. The Wife is awarded MP, a lump sum, and a clean break, with her claims dismissed upon payment.
- Parties
- Applicant: FB; Respondent: PS
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy (matrimonial) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; financial remedy order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Matrimonial Property, Trusts, Asset Division, Nuptial Settlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FB
Applicant
PS
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy (matrimonial) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the assets of the TS Trust be treated for the purposes of financial remedy?
- 2 Is there justification for departure from equal sharing of matrimonial assets due to unmatched contributions?
- 3 What is the correct quantification and division of the parties' assets, including property and loans?
Ratio Decidendi
The TS Trust is a resource of the Husband and should be treated as such for the purposes of asset division. Both parties made equal contributions to the marriage and the business, but the unmatched contribution of AR by TS justifies a departure from equality. The appropriate approach is to remove the majority of AR's value from the matrimonial assets before equal division. The Wife is awarded MP, a lump sum, and a clean break, with her claims dismissed upon payment.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; financial remedy order granted.
Orders
- MP to be transferred to the Wife at a net value of £5,850,000.
- Wife to receive a lump sum of £2,169,291, payable within two months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment