F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd. v Barthelemy & Anor [2011] EWHC 1851 (Ch) (14 July 2011)
The public interest in transparency, regulatory oversight, exoneration of witnesses, and the development of legal principles outweighs the private interests of the parties in suppressing the judgment. The court's discretion should be exercised to hand down the judgment despite the parties' conditional settlement.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 1851 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/part 20 Defendant: F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent: Francois Barthelemy; Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent: Anthony Culligan; Respondent: F&C Partners LLP; Respondent: F&C Asset Management plc; Cross Petitioner: F&C Investments (Holdings) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial/company Law Part 7 Claim, Section 994 Petition, Cross Petition / Post Trial, Application to Withhold Judgment After Settlement
- Outcome
- Application to withhold judgment dismissed; judgment to be handed down.
- Legal Topics
- Limited Liability Partnerships, Put Option Rights, Unfair Prejudice (section 994), Settlement and Withholding Judgment, Fiduciary Duties, Implied Terms in Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Limited
Claimant/part 20 Defendant
Francois Barthelemy
Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent
Anthony Culligan
Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent
F&C Partners LLP
Respondent
F&C Asset Management plc
Respondent
F&C Investments (Holdings) Limited
Cross Petitioner
Procedural Posture
Commercial/company Law Part 7 Claim, Section 994 Petition, Cross Petition / Post Trial, Application to Withhold Judgment After Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should withhold handing down a final judgment following a conditional settlement agreement between the parties
- 2 Public interest in publication of judgments involving regulated entities and serious allegations
- 3 Legal principles regarding the operation of LLPs, put options, and unfair prejudice under section 994
Ratio Decidendi
The public interest in transparency, regulatory oversight, exoneration of witnesses, and the development of legal principles outweighs the private interests of the parties in suppressing the judgment. The court's discretion should be exercised to hand down the judgment despite the parties' conditional settlement.
Court Disposition
Application to withhold judgment dismissed; judgment to be handed down.
Orders
- Judgment handed down with neutral citation [2011] EWHC 1731 (Ch)
- No permission to appeal sought in relation to this ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment