F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd. v Barthelemy & Anor [2011] EWHC 1851 (Ch) (14 July 2011)

F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Ltd. v Barthelemy & Anor [2011] EWHC 1851 (Ch) (14 July 2011)

The public interest in transparency, regulatory oversight, exoneration of witnesses, and the development of legal principles outweighs the private interests of the parties in suppressing the judgment. The court's discretion should be exercised to hand down the judgment despite the parties' conditional settlement.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 1851 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant/part 20 Defendant: F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Limited; Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent: Francois Barthelemy; Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent: Anthony Culligan; Respondent: F&C Partners LLP; Respondent: F&C Asset Management plc; Cross Petitioner: F&C Investments (Holdings) Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2011
Procedural Posture
Commercial/company Law Part 7 Claim, Section 994 Petition, Cross Petition / Post Trial, Application to Withhold Judgment After Settlement
Outcome
Application to withhold judgment dismissed; judgment to be handed down.
Legal Topics
Limited Liability Partnerships, Put Option Rights, Unfair Prejudice (section 994), Settlement and Withholding Judgment, Fiduciary Duties, Implied Terms in Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

F&C Alternative Investments (Holdings) Limited

Claimant/part 20 Defendant

Francois Barthelemy

Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent

Anthony Culligan

Defendant/part 20 Claimant/petitioner/respondent

F&C Partners LLP

Respondent

F&C Asset Management plc

Respondent

F&C Investments (Holdings) Limited

Cross Petitioner

Procedural Posture

Commercial/company Law Part 7 Claim, Section 994 Petition, Cross Petition / Post Trial, Application to Withhold Judgment After Settlement

  1. 1 Whether the court should withhold handing down a final judgment following a conditional settlement agreement between the parties
  2. 2 Public interest in publication of judgments involving regulated entities and serious allegations
  3. 3 Legal principles regarding the operation of LLPs, put options, and unfair prejudice under section 994

Ratio Decidendi

The public interest in transparency, regulatory oversight, exoneration of witnesses, and the development of legal principles outweighs the private interests of the parties in suppressing the judgment. The court's discretion should be exercised to hand down the judgment despite the parties' conditional settlement.

Court Disposition

Application to withhold judgment dismissed; judgment to be handed down.

Orders

  • Judgment handed down with neutral citation [2011] EWHC 1731 (Ch)
  • No permission to appeal sought in relation to this ruling