Ground Developments Ltd v FCC Construccion SA & Ors [2016] EWHC 1946 (TCC) (27 July 2016)

Ground Developments Ltd v FCC Construccion SA & Ors [2016] EWHC 1946 (TCC) (27 July 2016)

The adjudicator was validly appointed under the Scheme for Construction Contracts, acted within jurisdiction, and decided the dispute referred (failure to pay three payment applications due to lack of Pay Less Notices). The defences raised by the Joint Venture, including alleged lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, and uncertainty as to contract formation, were unfounded or insubstantial. The adjudicator's decision is enforceable by summary judgment.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 1946 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Ground Developments LTD; Defendant: FCC Construccion SA; Defendant: Samsung C&T ECUK Limited; Defendant: Kier Infrastructure and Overseas Limited; Defendant: Merseylink Civil Contractors JV
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Judgment (enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision) / High Court (tcc) Summary Judgment Hearing
Outcome
Summary judgment granted for the claimant (GDL).
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Natural Justice, Summary Judgment, Contract Formation
Construction Law Civil Procedure Adjudication Enforcement Jurisdiction of Adjudicator Natural Justice Summary Judgment Contract Formation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ground Developments LTD

Claimant

FCC Construccion SA

Defendant

Samsung C&T ECUK Limited

Defendant

Kier Infrastructure and Overseas Limited

Defendant

Merseylink Civil Contractors JV

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Summary Judgment (enforcement of Adjudicator's Decision) / High Court (tcc) Summary Judgment Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision is enforceable by summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator acted within jurisdiction
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of natural justice

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator was validly appointed under the Scheme for Construction Contracts, acted within jurisdiction, and decided the dispute referred (failure to pay three payment applications due to lack of Pay Less Notices). The defences raised by the Joint Venture, including alleged lack of jurisdiction, breach of natural justice, and uncertainty as to contract formation, were unfounded or insubstantial. The adjudicator's decision is enforceable by summary judgment.

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted for the claimant (GDL).

Orders

  • Defendants to pay GDL £199,008.90 plus VAT as ordered by the adjudicator.
  • Defendants to pay the adjudicator's fees of £8,175 plus VAT.