FDR Ltd v Dutton & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 200 (29 March 2017)
The correct method is the Modified Cumulative Approach, which preserves the pensioner's right to receive at least what would have been payable under the old rules, but does not entitle the pensioner to a blended or more generous increase than either the old or new rules would provide individually.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 200
- Parties
- Appellant: FDR Limited; Respondent: Carol Dutton; Respondent: David Lawrence; Respondent: Ty Miller; Respondent: Peter Motley; Respondent: Keith Rowling
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Pension Scheme Amendments, Accrued Rights Protection, Interpretation of Pension Deeds
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FDR Limited
Appellant
Carol Dutton
Respondent
David Lawrence
Respondent
Ty Miller
Respondent
Peter Motley
Respondent
Keith Rowling
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How do amended pension scheme rules interact with accrued rights under previous rules?
- 2 What is the correct method for calculating annual pension increases for pre-20 June 1991 service?
Ratio Decidendi
The correct method is the Modified Cumulative Approach, which preserves the pensioner's right to receive at least what would have been payable under the old rules, but does not entitle the pensioner to a blended or more generous increase than either the old or new rules would provide individually.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed. The Modified Cumulative Approach is the correct method for calculating annual pension increases for pre-20 June 1991 service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment