Fernando Melendez v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal struck out the application because the Information Commissioner had already provided an outcome to Mr Melendez's complaint, the Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 166 DPA18 is limited to procedural defects, and the application was in substance a challenge to the merits of the outcome, not a procedural omission.
- Parties
- Appellant: Fernando Melendez; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Data Subject Access Request, Jurisdiction, Procedural Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fernando Melendez
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the application under Section 166 DPA18 after the Information Commissioner has issued an outcome
- 2 Whether the application discloses any reasonable prospects of success under the procedural rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal struck out the application because the Information Commissioner had already provided an outcome to Mr Melendez's complaint, the Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 166 DPA18 is limited to procedural defects, and the application was in substance a challenge to the merits of the outcome, not a procedural omission.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment