Geologistics Ltd, R (on the application of) v Financial Services Compensation Scheme
The insured's legal costs incurred in defending a claim for which compulsory insurance was required are sufficiently connected to the liability subject to compulsory insurance to fall within the protection of section 6(5) of the Policyholders Protection Act 1975. The Scheme is liable to pay such costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Geologistics Limited; Defendant: Financial Services Compensation Scheme
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Policyholders Protection Act 1975, Employers' Liability (compulsory Insurance) Act 1969, Insurance Insolvency, Statutory Interpretation, Costs Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geologistics Limited
Claimant
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Financial Services Compensation Scheme is liable under section 6(5) of the Policyholders Protection Act 1975 to pay the insured's legal costs incurred in unsuccessfully defending a claim for damages for personal injuries brought by an employee, where the insurer is in liquidation.
Ratio Decidendi
The insured's legal costs incurred in defending a claim for which compulsory insurance was required are sufficiently connected to the liability subject to compulsory insurance to fall within the protection of section 6(5) of the Policyholders Protection Act 1975. The Scheme is liable to pay such costs.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Declaratory relief granted in favour of the claimant that the Scheme is liable to pay the claimant's proper costs of defending the proceedings brought by Mr Froggatt up to 17th June 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment