TMF Trustee Ltd & Ors v Fire Navigation Inc & Ors Re 'Megacore Honami' [2018] EWHC 2790 (Comm) (16 October 2018)
The balance of risk and justice overwhelmingly favours granting interim possession to the claimants; allegations of unclean hands and lack of full and frank disclosure are not made out; claimants are entitled to maintain possession pending final determination.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2790 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: TMF Trustee Limited; Claimant: TMF Global Services (UK) Limited; Claimant: Burlington Loan Management DAC; Claimant: Bank of America, N. A.; Defendant: Fire Navigation Inc; Defendant: Hurricane Navigation Inc; Defendant: OD Investment Ltd; Defendant: Oxygen Maritime Management Inc; Defendant: Igor Viatcheslavovich Kozin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Interim Application / Inter Partes Hearing Following Ex Parte Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Interim possession order confirmed; defendants' application to discharge set aside; prior holding order discharged.
- Legal Topics
- Mortgage Enforcement, Interim Relief, Full and Frank Disclosure, Clean Hands Doctrine, Judicial Sale of Vessel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TMF Trustee Limited
Claimant
TMF Global Services (UK) Limited
Claimant
Burlington Loan Management DAC
Claimant
Bank of America, N. A.
Claimant
Fire Navigation Inc
Defendant
Hurricane Navigation Inc
Defendant
OD Investment Ltd
Defendant
Oxygen Maritime Management Inc
Defendant
Igor Viatcheslavovich Kozin
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Interim Application / Inter Partes Hearing Following Ex Parte Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants are entitled to interim possession of Megacore Honami pending final determination
- 2 Whether claimants acted with unclean hands or failed to make full and frank disclosure on ex parte application
- 3 Whether mandatory interim relief is justified given the balance of risk and justice
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of risk and justice overwhelmingly favours granting interim possession to the claimants; allegations of unclean hands and lack of full and frank disclosure are not made out; claimants are entitled to maintain possession pending final determination.
Court Disposition
Interim possession order confirmed; defendants' application to discharge set aside; prior holding order discharged.
Orders
- Order of 25 September discharged.
- First defendant's application to set aside/discharge 22 September order dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment