Trident Turboprop (Dublin) Ltd v First Flight Couriers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1686 (Comm) (17 July 2008)
The lease agreements' exclusion clauses (clauses 19.1 and 19.2) contractually preclude FFCL from raising defences based on non-fraudulent misrepresentation or implied terms as to quality or fitness. UCTA 1977 does not apply because the contracts are international supply contracts within section 26(4), as the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 1686 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Trident Turboprop (Dublin) Limited; Defendant: First Flight Couriers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Lease Dispute (summary Judgment Application) / High Court, Summary Judgment Under CPR Part 24
- Outcome
- Summary judgment granted for the claimant (Trident Turboprop (Dublin) Limited) against the defendant (First Flight Couriers Limited).
- Legal Topics
- Aircraft Leasing, Summary Judgment, Misrepresentation, Exclusion Clauses, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982, Contractual Estoppel
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trident Turboprop (Dublin) Limited
Claimant
First Flight Couriers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Lease Dispute (summary Judgment Application) / High Court, Summary Judgment Under CPR Part 24
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant (FFCL) has a real prospect of defending the claim for unpaid rent and damages under two aircraft lease agreements
- 2 Whether exclusion clauses in the lease agreements preclude defences based on misrepresentation and defects
- 3 Whether the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies to the lease agreements
Ratio Decidendi
The lease agreements' exclusion clauses (clauses 19.1 and 19.2) contractually preclude FFCL from raising defences based on non-fraudulent misrepresentation or implied terms as to quality or fitness. UCTA 1977 does not apply because the contracts are international supply contracts within section 26(4), as the aircraft were to be carried from one state to another. Therefore, FFCL has no real prospect of defending the claim, and Trident is entitled to summary judgment.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment granted for the claimant (Trident Turboprop (Dublin) Limited) against the defendant (First Flight Couriers Limited).
Orders
- Trident entitled to judgment for unpaid rent, costs of putting aircraft into re-delivery condition, estimated further loss of rent, interest, and legal costs, subject to agreement on the form of order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment