Stimpson, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State

Stimpson, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State

The Inspector was entitled to give weight to the section 52 agreement as a material planning consideration, adequately reasoned the application of relevant development plan policies and PPG3, and was entitled to conclude that there was potential for community use; none of the grounds of challenge justified quashing the decision.

Parties
Claimant: Stimpson; Defendant: First Secretary of State
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Section 288 Application, Planning Permission, Material Considerations, Section 52 Agreement, Development Plan Policies, Greenfield Site, Community Facilities
Administrative Law Planning Law Section 288 Application Planning Permission Material Considerations Section 52 Agreement Development Plan Policies Greenfield Site +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stimpson

Claimant

First Secretary of State

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Inspector erred in attaching weight to the section 52 agreement
  2. 2 Whether the Inspector's reasoning regarding development plan policies was adequate
  3. 3 Whether the Inspector's approach to PPG3 was correct

Ratio Decidendi

The Inspector was entitled to give weight to the section 52 agreement as a material planning consideration, adequately reasoned the application of relevant development plan policies and PPG3, and was entitled to conclude that there was potential for community use; none of the grounds of challenge justified quashing the decision.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application to quash Inspector's decision refused
  • Claimant to pay defendant's costs, summarily assessed at £3,235