S, R (on the application of) v First-Tier Tribunal

S, R (on the application of) v First-Tier Tribunal

The statutory scheme under sections 82 and 83 of the 2002 Act does not breach Article 39 of Directive 2005/85/EC or the right to an effective remedy, as the combination of statutory appeal rights and judicial review satisfies EU law requirements. The applicant suffered no prejudice from the lack of an immediate appeal, and his best interests as a child were not compromised. There was no discrimination or unlawful disadvantage.

Parties
Claimant: The Queen on the Application of S; Defendant: First-Tier Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
Claim for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Right of Appeal, Effective Remedy, Asylum Procedures, Children's Rights, Judicial Review, Discrimination, Statutory Interpretation
Immigration Law Administrative Law European Union Law Child Law Right of Appeal Effective Remedy Asylum Procedures Children's Rights +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen on the Application of S

Claimant

First-Tier Tribunal

Defendant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether section 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 is incompatible with EU law, specifically Article 39 of Directive 2005/85/EC, by denying an effective remedy to asylum seekers granted discretionary leave for less than one year
  2. 2 Whether judicial review constitutes an effective remedy under EU law for refused asylum seekers unable to appeal under section 83
  3. 3 Whether the statutory scheme fails to safeguard the best interests of the child as required by domestic and international law

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory scheme under sections 82 and 83 of the 2002 Act does not breach Article 39 of Directive 2005/85/EC or the right to an effective remedy, as the combination of statutory appeal rights and judicial review satisfies EU law requirements. The applicant suffered no prejudice from the lack of an immediate appeal, and his best interests as a child were not compromised. There was no discrimination or unlawful disadvantage.

Court Disposition

Claim for judicial review dismissed