S & Ors, R (on the application of) v First-Tier Tribunal (IAC)
The right of appeal under section 83 of the 2002 Act arises when an individual has made an asylum claim that has been refused and is subsequently granted leave to remain for a period exceeding one year, regardless of whether the grant of leave is simultaneous with the refusal or follows further submissions. The making of further submissions or a subsequent application does not extinguish the right of appeal arising from the earlier refusal. The statutory and procedural framework supports this interpretation, and the Secretary of State's administrative practice cannot override the statutory right.
- Parties
- Claimant: S; Claimant: D; Claimant: W; Defendant: First-tier Tribunal (IAC); Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in S's case; permission granted and applications allowed in D and W's cases.
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Appeals, Statutory Interpretation, Right of Appeal, Indefinite Leave to Remain
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S
Claimant
D
Claimant
W
Claimant
First-tier Tribunal (IAC)
Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of indefinite leave to remain after a prior refusal of asylum gives rise to a right of appeal under section 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
- 2 Whether a subsequent application or further submissions extinguish the right of appeal under section 83
- 3 Whether the timing of the grant of leave relative to the refusal of asylum affects the right of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The right of appeal under section 83 of the 2002 Act arises when an individual has made an asylum claim that has been refused and is subsequently granted leave to remain for a period exceeding one year, regardless of whether the grant of leave is simultaneous with the refusal or follows further submissions. The making of further submissions or a subsequent application does not extinguish the right of appeal arising from the earlier refusal. The statutory and procedural framework supports this interpretation, and the Secretary of State's administrative practice cannot override the statutory right.
Court Disposition
Application granted in S's case; permission granted and applications allowed in D and W's cases.
Orders
- The applications for judicial review are granted.
- Permission to apply for judicial review is granted in D and W's cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment