Raphael De Lima Santiago v Motor Insurers' Bureau
Interpreter’s fees reasonably incurred to enable a vulnerable party to participate fully and give best evidence are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h), as this interpretation accords with the overriding objective and is not precluded by Cham, which is distinguishable.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Raphael De Lima Santiago; Respondent/defendant: Motor Insurers’ Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Costs Regime, Disbursements, Access to Justice, Vulnerable Parties, Interpreter Fees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raphael De Lima Santiago
Appellant/claimant
Motor Insurers’ Bureau
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interpreter’s fees are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h) in fixed costs cases
- 2 Whether the need for an interpreter constitutes a 'particular feature of the dispute'
- 3 Impact of the overriding objective and vulnerability provisions on interpretation of CPR 45.29I(h)
Ratio Decidendi
Interpreter’s fees reasonably incurred to enable a vulnerable party to participate fully and give best evidence are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h), as this interpretation accords with the overriding objective and is not precluded by Cham, which is distinguishable.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Interpreter’s fees are recoverable as a disbursement under CPR 45.29I(h)
- Costs to be assessed accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment