Jenni Glover & Anor v Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited & Ors
Permission to replace the structural engineering expert is granted because engineering evidence is central, the claimants themselves were not at fault, the trial date can be preserved, and there has been a full and frank admission and apology by the solicitors. The extent of disclosure already given is sufficient; further disclosure of attendance notes and emails is not required. The trial timetable is maintained for both liability and quantum, and the claimants must pay costs thrown away and 30% of the sixth defendant’s costs of considering the new expert’s evidence.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jenni Glover; Claimant: Littleton Glover; Defendant: Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited; Defendant: Chase Construction (Contracts) Limited; Defendant: Starstone Insurance SE; Defendant: Chubb London Aviation Limited; Defendant: Chubb European Group; Defendant: AXA XL Insurance Company Limited (formerly known as XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insurance/construction) / Interlocutory Application—permission to Change Expert, Directions, and Costs
- Outcome
- Permission to rely on Mr Hardy as expert revoked; permission granted to rely on Mr Tant as replacement expert; trial timetable maintained; further disclosure refused; costs orders made against claimants.
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Change of Expert, Disclosure, Costs, Case Management, Party Wall Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jenni Glover
Claimant
Littleton Glover
Claimant
Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited
Defendant
Chase Construction (Contracts) Limited
Defendant
Starstone Insurance SE
Defendant
Chubb London Aviation Limited
Defendant
Chubb European Group
Defendant
AXA XL Insurance Company Limited (formerly known as XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance/construction) / Interlocutory Application—permission to Change Expert, Directions, and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants should be permitted to replace their structural engineering expert after improper solicitor interference in the joint statement process
- 2 What conditions, if any, should attach to permission to change expert
- 3 Whether further disclosure of privileged communications is required
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to replace the structural engineering expert is granted because engineering evidence is central, the claimants themselves were not at fault, the trial date can be preserved, and there has been a full and frank admission and apology by the solicitors. The extent of disclosure already given is sufficient; further disclosure of attendance notes and emails is not required. The trial timetable is maintained for both liability and quantum, and the claimants must pay costs thrown away and 30% of the sixth defendant’s costs of considering the new expert’s evidence.
Court Disposition
Permission to rely on Mr Hardy as expert revoked; permission granted to rely on Mr Tant as replacement expert; trial timetable maintained; further disclosure refused; costs orders made against claimants.
Orders
- Permission to rely on Mr Hardy as expert revoked.
- Permission granted to rely on Richard Tant as structural engineering expert.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment