Novartis Ag & Ors v Focus Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors

Novartis Ag & Ors v Focus Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Ors

Defendants were overall successful and entitled to costs, but deductions were warranted for specific issues lost. Novartis ordered to pay 75% of Defendants' costs, with a payment on account set at 55% of 75%. Both sides' applications under CPR r. 31.22 were granted. Permission to appeal was granted to Novartis on added matter and narrowly on obviousness.

Parties
Claimant: Novartis AG; Claimant: LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG; Claimant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited; Defendant: Focus Pharmaceuticals Limited; Defendant: Actavis Group PTC EHF; Defendant: Actavis UK Limited; Defendant: Teva UK Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Patent / Post Trial Consequential Issues
Outcome
Novartis ordered to pay 75% of Defendants' costs; payment on account set at 55% of 75%; orders under CPR r. 31.22 granted; permission to appeal granted.
Legal Topics
Patent Validity, Costs, Permission to Appeal, Disclosure Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Novartis AG

Claimant

LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG

Claimant

Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited

Claimant

Focus Pharmaceuticals Limited

Defendant

Actavis Group PTC EHF

Defendant

Actavis UK Limited

Defendant

Teva UK Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent / Post Trial Consequential Issues

  1. 1 Entitlement to costs and percentage deduction
  2. 2 Payment on account of costs
  3. 3 Orders under CPR r. 31.22

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants were overall successful and entitled to costs, but deductions were warranted for specific issues lost. Novartis ordered to pay 75% of Defendants' costs, with a payment on account set at 55% of 75%. Both sides' applications under CPR r. 31.22 were granted. Permission to appeal was granted to Novartis on added matter and narrowly on obviousness.

Court Disposition

Novartis ordered to pay 75% of Defendants' costs; payment on account set at 55% of 75%; orders under CPR r. 31.22 granted; permission to appeal granted.

Orders

  • Novartis to pay 75% of Defendants' costs.
  • Novartis to make a payment on account of 55% of 75% of Defendants' total bill.