Fonecomp Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs
The Kittel principle is not limited to cases where the VAT fraud occurs in the same chain of supply as the transaction for which input tax deduction is claimed. It applies where the trader knew or should have known that their transaction was connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT, including in contra-trading scenarios. The trader does not need to know the specific details or mechanics of the fraud, only that their transaction was connected with such fraud. The findings of the tribunals below that Fonecomp should have known of the connection and participated in a transaction connected with VAT fraud were upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: Fonecomp Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax (vat), Input Tax Deduction, VAT Fraud, Contra Trading, Abuse of Rights, Knowledge Requirement in Tax Fraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fonecomp Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal (tax and Chancery Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Kittel principle is limited to fraud in the same chain of supply for VAT input deduction denial
- 2 Whether knowledge of the specific mechanics of fraud is required to deny input VAT deduction
- 3 What constitutes a sufficient connection between the transaction and VAT fraud
Ratio Decidendi
The Kittel principle is not limited to cases where the VAT fraud occurs in the same chain of supply as the transaction for which input tax deduction is claimed. It applies where the trader knew or should have known that their transaction was connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT, including in contra-trading scenarios. The trader does not need to know the specific details or mechanics of the fraud, only that their transaction was connected with such fraud. The findings of the tribunals below that Fonecomp should have known of the connection and participated in a transaction connected with VAT fraud were upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment