Agro Foods (Ashford) Ltd, R. (on the application of) v Food Standards Agency

Agro Foods (Ashford) Ltd, R. (on the application of) v Food Standards Agency

The power under regulation 4 of the Meat (Official Controls Charges) (England) Regulations 2009 to withdraw official controls at premises where judgment for unpaid charges has been entered against an operator is not confined to the same operator; it extends to successor operators at the same physical premises. 'Premises' refers to the location, not the unique establishment of a particular operator, and the regulation's language and structure support this broader interpretation to prevent evasion of charges through 'phoenix' arrangements.

Parties
Claimant: Agro Foods (Ashford) Limited; Defendant: Food Standards Agency
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Official Controls Charges, Successor Liability, Withdrawal of Official Controls, Interpretation of Regulations, Phoenix Companies
Administrative Law Food Law Statutory Interpretation Official Controls Charges Successor Liability Withdrawal of Official Controls Interpretation of Regulations Phoenix Companies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Agro Foods (Ashford) Limited

Claimant

Food Standards Agency

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether regulation 4 of the Meat (Official Controls Charges) (England) Regulations 2009 allows the Food Standards Agency to withdraw official controls at premises operated by a successor operator, where judgment for unpaid charges was entered against a predecessor operator.

Ratio Decidendi

The power under regulation 4 of the Meat (Official Controls Charges) (England) Regulations 2009 to withdraw official controls at premises where judgment for unpaid charges has been entered against an operator is not confined to the same operator; it extends to successor operators at the same physical premises. 'Premises' refers to the location, not the unique establishment of a particular operator, and the regulation's language and structure support this broader interpretation to prevent evasion of charges through 'phoenix' arrangements.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim for judicial review is dismissed.