Olafsson v Foreign & Commonwealth Office
The claimant acted reasonably in seeking to recover his loss from the FCO and should not be required to undertake uncertain litigation in Iceland, especially given the expert evidence and refusal of indemnity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jón Ólafsson; Defendant: Foreign and Commonwealth Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Negligence / Judgment on Quantification of Loss After Liability Admitted
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant; issues of legal fees referred to a costs judge.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Mitigation of Loss, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Service of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jón Ólafsson
Claimant
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Negligence / Judgment on Quantification of Loss After Liability Admitted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant acted reasonably in pursuing the FCO for losses rather than seeking a second default judgment and enforcement in Iceland
- 2 Whether a second default judgment would be enforceable in Iceland under the Lugano Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant acted reasonably in seeking to recover his loss from the FCO and should not be required to undertake uncertain litigation in Iceland, especially given the expert evidence and refusal of indemnity.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant; issues of legal fees referred to a costs judge.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the claimant with damages to be assessed.
- Interim payment of £63,108 ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment