Kimathi & Ors v Foreign & Commonwealth Office
The judge's refusal to disapply the Limitation Act was a proper exercise of discretion, as the prejudice to the defendant from the loss of evidence and inability to have a fair trial outweighed any prejudice to the claimant, and no error of law or misdirection was shown.
- Parties
- Appellants: Kimathi & Ors; Respondent: Foreign & Commonwealth Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Disapplication of Limitation, Trespass to the Person, Torture and Abuse Claims, Judicial Discretion, Fair Trial Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kimathi & Ors
Appellants
Foreign & Commonwealth Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to disapply the Limitation Act 1980 under section 33 for claims of torture and abuse by TC 34
- 2 Whether the judge failed to properly consider reasons for delay, the date when the action should have been brought, the cogency of evidence, and even-handedness in assessing prejudice
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's refusal to disapply the Limitation Act was a proper exercise of discretion, as the prejudice to the defendant from the loss of evidence and inability to have a fair trial outweighed any prejudice to the claimant, and no error of law or misdirection was shown.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for permission to appeal by TC34 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment