Save Historic Newmarket Ltd & Ors v Forest Heath District Council & Ors [2011] EWHC 606 (Admin) (25 March 2011)
The final strategic environmental assessment report accompanying the Core Strategy failed to identify and evaluate reasonable alternatives or explain the reasons for their rejection, and did not address the environmental impact of increased housing numbers, thereby breaching the requirements of Directive 2001/42/EC and the 2004 Regulations. Relief must be granted to the claimants on this ground.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 606 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Save Historic Newmarket Ltd; Claimant: Tattersalls Ltd; Claimant: Unex Group Holdings Ltd; Claimant: Jockey Club Estates Ltd; Claimant: Newmarket Trainers' Federation; Claimant: Godolphin Management Company Limited; Claimant: Darley Stud Management Company Ltd; Defendant: Forest Heath District Council; Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government; Interested Party: Edward Richard William Stanley, 19th Earl of Derby ("Lord Derby")
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Strategic Environmental Assessment, Local Development Framework, Procedural Fairness, EU Law Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Save Historic Newmarket Ltd
Claimant
Tattersalls Ltd
Claimant
Unex Group Holdings Ltd
Claimant
Jockey Club Estates Ltd
Claimant
Newmarket Trainers' Federation
Claimant
Godolphin Management Company Limited
Claimant
Darley Stud Management Company Ltd
Claimant
Forest Heath District Council
Defendant
Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government
Defendant
Edward Richard William Stanley, 19th Earl of Derby ("Lord Derby")
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Forest Heath Core Strategy was adopted in breach of the requirements for a strategic environmental assessment under Directive 2001/42/EC and the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004
- 2 Whether there was a procedural defect in the consultation process depriving affected parties of the opportunity to comment on technical documents
Ratio Decidendi
The final strategic environmental assessment report accompanying the Core Strategy failed to identify and evaluate reasonable alternatives or explain the reasons for their rejection, and did not address the environmental impact of increased housing numbers, thereby breaching the requirements of Directive 2001/42/EC and the 2004 Regulations. Relief must be granted to the claimants on this ground.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Relief to be granted to the claimants for breach of the Directive and Regulations; court to hear counsel on the precise order to be made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment