Sidnell v Wilson [1966] EWCA Civ 2 (14 January 1966)
The landlord need only establish a prima facie or arguable case of breach of covenant to repair to obtain leave to forfeit under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 s.1(5); the County Court Judge erred in requiring proof of breach as at trial. The appeal is allowed and leave granted.
- Citation
- [1966] EWCA Civ 2
- Parties
- Landlord: Mr Sidnell v Wilson; Tenant (original): Mr Carver; Tenants (assignees): Mr Wilson, Mr Arnaudy, Mr Rollingson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 1966
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Application for Leave to Forfeit Lease
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture of Lease, Breach of Covenant to Repair, Leasehold Property (repairs) Act 1938, Counter Notice Procedure, Standard of Proof on Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Sidnell v Wilson
Landlord
Mr Carver
Tenant (original)
Mr Wilson, Mr Arnaudy, Mr Rollingson
Tenants (assignees)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Application for Leave to Forfeit Lease
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether landlord must prove actual breach or only a prima facie/arguable case of breach to obtain leave to forfeit under Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 s.1(5)
- 2 Whether the notice served complied with statutory requirements
- 3 Whether special circumstances justified granting leave
Ratio Decidendi
The landlord need only establish a prima facie or arguable case of breach of covenant to repair to obtain leave to forfeit under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 s.1(5); the County Court Judge erred in requiring proof of breach as at trial. The appeal is allowed and leave granted.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave to forfeit granted to landlord
- Costs below to be costs in the forthcoming action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment