Christian, R. v
The trial judge was entitled to conclude that the defence of loss of control was not available based on the evidence, particularly the extreme and protracted nature of the applicant's actions. The judge's approach to the admissibility of previous convictions and the directions regarding the pathological evidence were proper. The grounds of appeal were not arguable.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Foster Reginald Christian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Self Defence, Loss of Control, Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Foster Reginald Christian
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to leave the partial defence of loss of control to the jury
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of previous convictions for violence
- 3 Whether the judge's directions regarding the trajectory of wounds and the applicant's account were proper
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge was entitled to conclude that the defence of loss of control was not available based on the evidence, particularly the extreme and protracted nature of the applicant's actions. The judge's approach to the admissibility of previous convictions and the directions regarding the pathological evidence were proper. The grounds of appeal were not arguable.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment