Aspinall's Club Ltd. v Al-Zayat

Aspinall's Club Ltd. v Al-Zayat

The substitute cheque was not post-dated within the meaning of the Gaming Act 1968, any agreement not to present the cheque was not binding or supported by consideration, there was no unlawful provision of credit, and the underlying loan agreements remained enforceable. The defence disclosed no reasonable grounds and the claimant was entitled to summary judgment.

Parties
Claimant: Aspinall’s Club Limited; Defendant: Fouad Al-Zayat
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Cheques, Illegality Under Gaming Act 1968, Summary Judgment, Provision of Credit in Gaming, Underlying Loan Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aspinall’s Club Limited

Claimant

Fouad Al-Zayat

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Summary Judgment Application

  1. 1 Whether the substitute cheque was post-dated and thus unlawful under section 16(2) of the Gaming Act 1968
  2. 2 Whether the claimant breached an agreement not to date or present the cheque
  3. 3 Whether the provision of the cheque amounted to unlawful credit under the Gaming Act

Ratio Decidendi

The substitute cheque was not post-dated within the meaning of the Gaming Act 1968, any agreement not to present the cheque was not binding or supported by consideration, there was no unlawful provision of credit, and the underlying loan agreements remained enforceable. The defence disclosed no reasonable grounds and the claimant was entitled to summary judgment.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted in favour of the claimant for the sum claimed.