Hlal, R. v

Hlal, R. v

The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the gravity of the offences, the vulnerability of the victims, the applicant's previous convictions, and the aggravating features. There was no good reason for an extension of time, and leave to appeal was refused.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Fowzi Hlal
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 April 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Rape, Dangerousness, Sentencing, Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Rape Dangerousness Sentencing Extension of Time Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Fowzi Hlal

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's youth and lack of maturity were sufficiently considered
  3. 3 Whether there was good reason to extend time for renewing the application for leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the gravity of the offences, the vulnerability of the victims, the applicant's previous convictions, and the aggravating features. There was no good reason for an extension of time, and leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Refuse to extend time
  • Refuse leave to appeal