FPK, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 237 (14 February 2025)
The judge's approach to sentencing, including the starting point and aggregation, was within the guidelines and permissible. The extended sentence must be attached to count 2, and the sentence for count 4 is corrected to 3 years 9 months. The renewed grounds of appeal are refused.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 237
- Parties
- Appellant: FPK; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; sentence record corrected
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Appeals, Extended Sentences, Anonymity Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FPK
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge applied the correct starting point within the guidelines
- 2 Whether the judge erred in increasing the sentence on the lead offence
- 3 Whether the judge failed to specify which sentence attracted the extended sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's approach to sentencing, including the starting point and aggregation, was within the guidelines and permissible. The extended sentence must be attached to count 2, and the sentence for count 4 is corrected to 3 years 9 months. The renewed grounds of appeal are refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; sentence record corrected
Orders
- Extended sentence attached to count 2
- Sentence for count 4 corrected to 3 years 9 months concurrent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment