Braspetro Oil Services Company & Anor v FPSO Construction Inc & Anor
On the true construction of the Side Letter Agreements, each Side Letter Agreement gave rise to an obligation on the part of FCI to repay to Brasoil such sums, if any, paid by Brasoil to a third party supplier following a conforming written request, subject to the aggregate limit. The reservation of claims in the Side Letter Agreements is in wide terms and includes all claims, costs, and expenses due to either party in relation to the projects, including contractual and quasi-contractual claims. The Jurong Settlement Agreement does not preclude FCI from asserting cross-claims against Brasoil when facing claims under the Side Letter Agreements.
- Parties
- Claimant: Braspetro Oil Services Company; Claimant: Petroleo Brasileiro S. A. Petrobras; Defendant: FPSO Construction Inc.; Defendant: FPSO Engeneering Inc.; Defendant: FSO Construction Inc.; Defendant: FSO Engeneering Inc.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contractual Dispute (preliminary Issues) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined: Brasoil is entitled in principle to payment from FCI of amounts paid to third party suppliers under the Side Letter Agreements; FCI is not precluded from asserting cross-claims or defences by reason of the Jurong Settlement Agreement or the Side Letter Agreements.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Contracts, Set Off and Cross Claims, Obligations Under Side Letter Agreements, Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Braspetro Oil Services Company
Claimant
Petroleo Brasileiro S. A. Petrobras
Claimant
FPSO Construction Inc.
Defendant
FPSO Engeneering Inc.
Defendant
FSO Construction Inc.
Defendant
FSO Engeneering Inc.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contractual Dispute (preliminary Issues) / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether, on the proper construction of the Side Letter Agreements, Brasoil is entitled to payment from FCI of amounts paid to third party suppliers (including Jurong) by Brasoil pursuant to the Side Letter Agreements
- 2 Whether the defendants are precluded from asserting cross-claims or defences by reason of the Jurong Settlement Agreement and/or the Side Letter Agreements
Ratio Decidendi
On the true construction of the Side Letter Agreements, each Side Letter Agreement gave rise to an obligation on the part of FCI to repay to Brasoil such sums, if any, paid by Brasoil to a third party supplier following a conforming written request, subject to the aggregate limit. The reservation of claims in the Side Letter Agreements is in wide terms and includes all claims, costs, and expenses due to either party in relation to the projects, including contractual and quasi-contractual claims. The Jurong Settlement Agreement does not preclude FCI from asserting cross-claims against Brasoil when facing claims under the Side Letter Agreements.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined: Brasoil is entitled in principle to payment from FCI of amounts paid to third party suppliers under the Side Letter Agreements; FCI is not precluded from asserting cross-claims or defences by reason of the Jurong Settlement Agreement or the Side Letter Agreements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment