Alliance Petrochemical Investment (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Francesco Mazzagatti & Anor
The defendants' foreign illegality defence is unarguable because it fails to plead that the alleged illegal acts occurred in the United States or that US law is the governing law; English law requires a territorial nexus for a foreign illegality defence, which is not satisfied on the pleadings.
- Parties
- Claimant: Alliance Petrochemical Investment (Singapore) Pte Ltd; Defendant: Francesco Mazzagatti; Defendant: Francesco Dixit Dominus
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Civil Claim / Application to Strike Out Parts of Defence
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; paragraphs of the defence struck out
- Legal Topics
- Illegality Defence, Foreign Law Sanctions, Strike Out Applications, Public Policy, Breach of Trust, Dishonest Assistance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alliance Petrochemical Investment (Singapore) Pte Ltd
Claimant
Francesco Mazzagatti
Defendant
Francesco Dixit Dominus
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Civil Claim / Application to Strike Out Parts of Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants' foreign illegality defence based on US sanctions law is arguable under English law
- 2 Whether the defence should be struck out for lack of territorial nexus
- 3 Whether English public policy precludes reliance on US extraterritorial sanctions
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants' foreign illegality defence is unarguable because it fails to plead that the alleged illegal acts occurred in the United States or that US law is the governing law; English law requires a territorial nexus for a foreign illegality defence, which is not satisfied on the pleadings.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; paragraphs of the defence struck out
Orders
- Strike out of sentences or parts of sentences from paragraphs 4 and 62, and the whole of paragraphs 114 to 117 of the defence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment