Wessely & Anor (Zoom UK Distribution Ltd) v Rubra & Ors

Wessely & Anor (Zoom UK Distribution Ltd) v Rubra & Ors

Failure to comply with paragraph 26(1)(b) of Schedule B1 is a procedural defect, not a fundamental breach; the administrators' appointment is valid and their acts are valid. Costs should be borne by the directors due to their mistake.

Parties
Applicant: Francis Wessely; Applicant: Joann Louise Leach; Respondent: Stephen Rubra; Respondent: Anthony Bekesi; Respondent: Zoom UK Distribution Ltd (in administration)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Judgment
Outcome
Directions Application granted; administrators' appointment and acts declared valid; costs ordered against directors; permission to appeal costs refused.
Legal Topics
Administrator Appointment Validity, Procedural Defects, Costs Orders
Insolvency Law Company Law Administrator Appointment Validity Procedural Defects Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Wessely

Applicant

Joann Louise Leach

Applicant

Stephen Rubra

Respondent

Anthony Bekesi

Respondent

Zoom UK Distribution Ltd (in administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Insolvency Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does failure to comply with paragraph 26(1)(b) of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 render the administrators' appointment void or merely defective?
  2. 2 Are acts of administrators valid despite procedural defects in appointment?
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of applications arising from procedural defects?

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to comply with paragraph 26(1)(b) of Schedule B1 is a procedural defect, not a fundamental breach; the administrators' appointment is valid and their acts are valid. Costs should be borne by the directors due to their mistake.

Court Disposition

Directions Application granted; administrators' appointment and acts declared valid; costs ordered against directors; permission to appeal costs refused.

Orders

  • Declaration that administrators' appointment on 5 May 2020 was valid.
  • Declaration that acts of administrators since 5 May 2020 are valid.