Clifford, R v [2014] EWCA Crim 2245 (07 November 2014)
Despite errors by the sentencing judge in treating bad character evidence and appellant's conduct as aggravating factors, the overall sentence of 8 years was justified and proportionate given the seriousness, multiplicity, and aggravating features of the offences, and did not breach statutory or human rights...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Crim 2245
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: Frank Maxwell Clifford
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure, Bad Character Evidence, Article 7 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
Frank Maxwell Clifford
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 8 years was manifestly excessive for historic indecent assault offences
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by treating bad character evidence and appellant's conduct as aggravating factors
- 3 Whether there was a breach of Article 7(1) ECHR by reference to modern sentencing guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
Despite errors by the sentencing judge in treating bad character evidence and appellant's conduct as aggravating factors, the overall sentence of 8 years was justified and proportionate given the seriousness, multiplicity, and aggravating features of the offences, and did not breach statutory or human rights principles.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment