Greenwich Inc Ltd v Dowling & Ors
The undertakings and freezing orders must be discharged due to failures in full and frank disclosure, misrepresentation of the standard form of orders, and errors by both counsel and solicitors in not drawing non-standard provisions to the court's attention. The court retains discretion to deliver judgment after settlement, and in this case, public interest and judicial transparency justify publication of the judgment.
- Parties
- Claimant: Greenwich Inc. Limited (in administration); Administrators: Stephen John Hunt and Timothy James Bramston; Claimant: Greenwich Inc. Trading Limited (in liquidation); Liquidator: Timothy James Bramston; Defendant: Frank Nugent Dowling; Defendant: Audrey McCracken; Defendant: Madison Lease Limited; Defendant: Craig O'Brien; Defendant: Trafalgar Tavern Trading Limited; Defendant: Spread Eagle Trading Limited; Defendant: American Bar & Grill Trading Limited; Defendant: Union Square Trading Limited; Defendant: Madison New Trading Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Discharge of Undertakings/freezing Orders
- Outcome
- Undertakings and freezing orders discharged; court exercises discretion to deliver judgment despite settlement.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Ex Parte Applications, Full and Frank Disclosure, Director Fiduciary Duties, Asset Dissipation, Non Standard Orders, Court Discretion, Settlement and Judgment Delivery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greenwich Inc. Limited (in administration)
Claimant
Stephen John Hunt and Timothy James Bramston
Administrators
Greenwich Inc. Trading Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Timothy James Bramston
Liquidator
Frank Nugent Dowling
Defendant
Audrey McCracken
Defendant
Madison Lease Limited
Defendant
Craig O'Brien
Defendant
Trafalgar Tavern Trading Limited
Defendant
Spread Eagle Trading Limited
Defendant
American Bar & Grill Trading Limited
Defendant
Union Square Trading Limited
Defendant
Madison New Trading Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Discharge of Undertakings/freezing Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether undertakings/freezing orders should be discharged due to failures in full and frank disclosure
- 2 Whether non-standard provisions in freezing orders were properly disclosed
- 3 Whether the court retains discretion to deliver judgment after settlement
Ratio Decidendi
The undertakings and freezing orders must be discharged due to failures in full and frank disclosure, misrepresentation of the standard form of orders, and errors by both counsel and solicitors in not drawing non-standard provisions to the court's attention. The court retains discretion to deliver judgment after settlement, and in this case, public interest and judicial transparency justify publication of the judgment.
Court Disposition
Undertakings and freezing orders discharged; court exercises discretion to deliver judgment despite settlement.
Orders
- Discharge of undertakings and freezing orders granted.
- Judgment delivered and published for public interest and procedural guidance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment