Frank Savage v Raymond Savage

Frank Savage v Raymond Savage

Section 15(3) TOLATA does not preclude the court from considering the circumstances and wishes of minority beneficiaries in the event of a dispute; it only obliges the court to have regard to the wishes of the majority by value, but does not exclude consideration of other relevant factors, including those of the minority.

Parties
Appellant: Frank Savage; Respondent: Raymond Savage
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Family Court Decision
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (tolata), Judicial Discretion, Statutory Interpretation, Majority and Minority Beneficiaries' Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank Savage

Appellant

Raymond Savage

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Family Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether section 15(3) of TOLATA precludes the court from considering the circumstances and wishes of minority beneficiaries in the event of a dispute between beneficiaries.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 15(3) TOLATA does not preclude the court from considering the circumstances and wishes of minority beneficiaries in the event of a dispute; it only obliges the court to have regard to the wishes of the majority by value, but does not exclude consideration of other relevant factors, including those of the minority.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of the Family Court judge set aside.
  • Order of the District Judge restored, granting Frank Savage a right of pre-emption to purchase Raymond Savage's interest in the properties at the specified price.