Sines, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 713 (24 May 2023)
The sentencing judge was entitled to proceed on the basis of the March 2022 psychiatric report, refuse adjournment, and impose a custodial sentence for the index offence given the seriousness, aggravating factors, and lack of new or exceptional circumstances; activation of the suspended sentences was not unjust or disproportionate.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 713
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Frank Sines
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Breach of Suspended Sentence Order, Mental Health and Sentencing, Assault on Emergency Worker
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Frank Sines
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in refusing to adjourn for an updated psychiatric report under section 232 of the Sentencing Act 2020
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed for the index offence was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 3 Whether the activation of suspended sentence orders was unjust or disproportionate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to proceed on the basis of the March 2022 psychiatric report, refuse adjournment, and impose a custodial sentence for the index offence given the seriousness, aggravating factors, and lack of new or exceptional circumstances; activation of the suspended sentences was not unjust or disproportionate.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment