Director of Public Prosecutions v Wilson
A prohibited arrest under section 6D(3) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 does not invalidate subsequent procedures for obtaining blood samples, provided all other statutory requirements are met. The magistrates were wrong to exclude the blood sample evidence solely on the basis of the prohibited arrest.
- Parties
- Claimant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Frank Wilson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court to High Court
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; case remitted with direction to convict
- Legal Topics
- Drink Driving, Unlawful Arrest, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Claimant
Frank Wilson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether blood samples taken after a prohibited arrest at hospital are inadmissible under section 6D of the Road Traffic Act 1988
- 2 Whether evidence of blood alcohol level can be admitted under section 15(2) of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 despite a prohibited arrest
- 3 Whether R v Fox permits admission of evidence obtained after an unlawful or prohibited arrest
Ratio Decidendi
A prohibited arrest under section 6D(3) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 does not invalidate subsequent procedures for obtaining blood samples, provided all other statutory requirements are met. The magistrates were wrong to exclude the blood sample evidence solely on the basis of the prohibited arrest.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; case remitted with direction to convict
Orders
- Case remitted to magistrates with direction to convict Frank Wilson
- Costs of £1,293.50 awarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment