Smallman & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 548 (30 March 2010)

Smallman & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 548 (30 March 2010)

The DfES funding arrangement, even if ultra vires, did not undermine the independence of the investigation or prosecution, nor did it cause significant prejudice to the defendants. The judge's summing up, though lengthy and unimaginative, was fair and did not render the trial unsafe. There was sufficient evidence for all convictions, and disclosure failures did not affect trial fairness.

Citation
[2010] EWCA Crim 548
Parties
Prosecution: R; First Appellant/defendant: Michael Smallman; Second Appellant/defendant: Angela Smallman
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Trading, Proceeds of Crime, Abuse of Process, Disclosure, Director Disqualification
Criminal Law Company Law Fraudulent Trading Proceeds of Crime Abuse of Process Disclosure Director Disqualification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Michael Smallman

First Appellant/defendant

Angela Smallman

Second Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the funding of the police investigation by the DfES constituted an abuse of process
  2. 2 Whether the judge's summing up rendered the trial unfair
  3. 3 Whether there was sufficient evidence for convictions on all counts

Ratio Decidendi

The DfES funding arrangement, even if ultra vires, did not undermine the independence of the investigation or prosecution, nor did it cause significant prejudice to the defendants. The judge's summing up, though lengthy and unimaginative, was fair and did not render the trial unsafe. There was sufficient evidence for all convictions, and disclosure failures did not affect trial fairness.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Convictions of Michael Smallman and Angela Smallman upheld
  • Sentence for Angela Smallman upheld